|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]伍清林,金兰梅,李明杰,等.动物园部分野生动物馆内空气质量检测[J].应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(06):948-953.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00948]
 WU Qinling,JIN Lanmei,LI Mingjie,et al.Room Air Quality for Wild Animals in Nanjing Hongshan Forest Zoo[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2012,18(06):948-953.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00948]
点击复制

动物园部分野生动物馆内空气质量检测()
分享到:

《应用与环境生物学报》[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]

卷:
18卷
期数:
2012年06期
页码:
948-953
栏目:
研究论文
出版日期:
2012-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Room Air Quality for Wild Animals in Nanjing Hongshan Forest Zoo
作者:
伍清林 金兰梅 李明杰 邓长林 周正凯 陆松兵 杨飞 丁娇娇 田红艳
(1金陵科技学院动物科学与技术学院 南京 210038)
(2南京红山森林动物园 南京 210037)
Author(s):
WU Qinling JIN Lanmei LI Mingjie DENG Changlin ZHOU Zhengkai LU Songbing YANG fei DING Jiaojiao TIAN Hongyan
(1College of Animal Science, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, China)
(2Nanjing Hongshan Forest Zoo, Nanjing 210037, China)
关键词:
动物园空气质量氨气硫化氢细菌总数
Keywords:
zoo air quality ammonia hydrogen sulphide bacterial count
分类号:
X174 : X823
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00948
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为向动物园预防动物疾病、保障动物健康提供科学依据,采用环境检测方法对南京红山森林动物园的鹦鹉馆、孔雀馆和袋鼠馆进行空气质量检测. 结果显示,氨气(NH3)的含量,鹦鹉馆内春、夏、秋、冬分别为2.69、4.61、3.07、5.48 mg/m3,孔雀馆内分别为1.66、0.98、0.66、1.15 mg/m3,袋鼠馆内分别为1.66、2.51、1.47、2.20 mg/m3;硫化氢(H2S)的含量,鹦鹉馆内春、夏、秋、冬分别为0.015 9、0.016 3、0.017 0、0.027 3 mg/m3,孔雀馆内分别为0.029 4、0.077 6、0.050 7、0.036 1 mg/m3,袋鼠馆内分别为0.004 2、0.005 1、0.009 5、0.007 4 mg/m3;细菌总数,鹦鹉馆内春、夏、秋、冬分别为15.40×103、21.53×103、20.91×103、7.73×103 cfu/m3,孔雀馆内分别为25.20×103、42.61×103、42.18×103、29.40×103 cfu/m3,袋鼠馆内分别为10.70×103、19.8×103、2.86×103、4.34×103 cfu/m3. 动物舍空气环境中细菌菌落总数、氨气、硫化氢的浓度与温度、湿度呈正相关,与风速呈负相关. 空气环境质量也受动物饲养方式、饲养的数量和饲料的质量影响. 图3 表2 参13
Abstract:
In order to collect the data of the air quality, control the disease in animals, and provide the scientific basis for protecting animals’ health, the air quality of animals’ houses in Nanjing Hongshan Forest Zoo was continuously detected. The air was collected from rooms of parrots, peacocks and kangaroos. The ammonia concentrations in spring, summer, autumn and winter were as following: 2.69, 4.61, 3.07 and 5.48 mg/m3 in the parrots’ room; 1.66, 0.98, 0.66 and 1.15 mg/m3 in the peacocks’ room; 1.66, 2.51, 1.47 and 2.20 mg/m3 in the kangaroos’ room, respectively. The hydrogen sulphide concentrations in spring, summer, autumn and winter were: 0.015 9, 0.016 3, 0.017 0 and 0.027 3 mg/m3 for parrots; 0.029 4, 0.077 6, 0.050 7 and 0.036 1 mg/m3 for peacocks; 0.004 2, 0.0051, 0.0095 and 0.0074 mg/m3 for kangaroos, respectively. The bacteriual counts in spring, summer, autumn and winter were 15.40×103, 21.53×103, 20.91×103 and 7.73×103 cfu/m3 for parrots; 25.20×103, 42.61×103, 42.18×103 and 29.40×103 cfu/m3 for peacocks; 10.70×103, 19.8×103, 2.86×103 and 4.34×103 cfu/m3 for kangaroos, respectively. These founding indicated that the air quality was influenced by temperature, humidity, and wind speed, but also by feeding practice, animal density and feed quality. Fig 3, Tab 2, Ref 13

参考文献/References:

1 Lou YJ (娄玉杰), Zhou HZ (周海柱). Beef cattle field environment quality and its evaluation. Mod J Anim Husbandry & Vet Med (现代畜牧兽医), 2010 (2): 26~27
2 Chai TJ (柴同杰), Zhao YL (赵云玲), Liu WB (刘文波) , Liu H (刘辉). The resistance against antibiotics of bacteria from a poultry house and their spreading to surroundings of the house. Chin J Preventive Vet Med (中国预防兽医学报), 2003, 25 (3): 209~214
3 Zhu ZP (朱志平), Dong HM (董红敏), Shang B (尚斌), Kang GH (康国虎), Zhu HS (朱海生), Shi Y (石谊). Measurement of ammonia and nitrous oxide concentrations and estimation of the emission rates from gestation pig buildings. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2006, 22 (Suppl 2): 175~178
4 Qu K, Lee SW, Bian JS, et al. Review hydrogen sulfide: neurochemistry and neurobiology. Neurochem Intern, 2008, 52: 155~165
5 Weng JZ (翁建中), Xu-HS (徐恒省), Wang YC (王亚超), Zhao LY (赵凌宇). Study on monitoring method for detecting total bacteria and mildew in the air. Environ Monit China (中国环境监测), 2008, 24 (4): 28~30
6 GB/T18204.1-2000 Methods of microbiological examination for air of public places. Determination of aerobic bacterial count. Beijing: Standards Press of China (北京: 标准出版社), 2005
7 Li RZ (李如志). Livestock Environment Hygiene. 3rd ed. Beijing: Agricultural Press of China (北京: 农业出版社), 2003, 2: 262~268
8 Wu QL (伍清林), Jin LM (金兰梅), Deng CL (邓长林), Zhou ZK (周正凯), Hua W (花雯), Xu L (徐蕾), Xu X (徐雪), Huan YJ (宦蕴军). A survey on the common pathogens of internal and external environment of zoo animal hold. Acta Ecol Anim Domastici (家畜生态学报), 2010, 31 (6): 70~75
9 NY/T 388-1999 Environmental quality standards for livestock and poultry farm
10 Wang KY (汪开英), Dai XR (代小蓉). Livestock and poultry farms air pollution on human health effects. Chin J Anim Sci (中国畜牧杂志), 2008, 44 (10): 32~35
11 Fang ZG (方治国), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Hu LF (胡利锋), Wang XK (王效科), Lin XQ (林学强). Advance in characteristics of airborne bacteria communities in outdoor environment. Chin J Appl Environ Biol (应用与环境生物学报), 2005, 11 (1): 123~128
12 Li XJ (李秀金). Generation and control of odorous gases on animal farms. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2001, 217 (5): 78~81
13 Liu XY (刘希颖), Zhao Y (赵越). Toxic and harmful gases in the barn on the hazards and prevention of livestock. Feed Ind (饲料工业), 2004, 25 (10): 58~60

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
江苏省教育厅高校科研成果产业推进工程基金项目(No. JH08-13),2009年江苏省大学生实践创新训练计划项目(No. 40700027)和金陵科技学院教育教学改革研究项目(No. TY091007) Supported by the Department of Education of Jiangsu, China (No. JH08-13), the College Students’ Practice and Innovation Training Project of Jiangsu in 2009 (No. 40700027) and the Jinling Institute of Technology (No. TY091007)
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-12-28